A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor. Besides, reviewer(s) may also assist the author in improving the paper.ДЄny selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.ДЄny manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Reviewer(s) assists the editorial team in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author. Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. The editor and any editorial board member must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate. The journal used iThenticateВ to detect the possibilities of plagiarism in the manuscript.ДЄn editor at any time evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. Sci) is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be accepted for publication. The editor of the Journal of Food and Pharmaceutical Sciences ( J. In addition, the IHIS Gadjah Mada University and Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and necessary. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. Sci) takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. IHIS Universitas Gadjah MAda, Indonesia as publisher of Journal of Food and Pharmaceutical Sciences ( J. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher as well as the society. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Sci) is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed Journal of Food and Pharmaceutical Sciences ( J. This statement is relied on Practice Guidelines for publication as in Committee on Publication Ethics (COPEвЂ™s Best).Д®thical Guideline for Journal Publication Sci, including the author(s), Editor in Chief, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewer, and the publisher (IHIS, Universitas Gadjah ). This statement clarifies ethical conduct to all parties involved in manuscript publication J. Sci) is an international peer-reviewed journal. Journal of Food and Pharmaceutical Sciences ( J. Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

Uf ithenticate